STIHL Lawn Mower Reviews vs. the STIHL MS 170 Chainsaw: What a Service Manager Would Tell You
Posted on 2026-09-07 by Jane Smith
I work in the repair side of outdoor power equipment, not the marketing side. Over the past eight years, I’ve coordinated something like 300 rush repairs for landscapers, arborists, and property managers. That changes the way I read product reviews. When someone asks whether STIHL lawn mower reviews are accurate, or whether the STIHL MS 170 chainsaw is worth buying, I don’t start with a spec sheet. I start with one question: what is the worst day that machine needs to survive?
I can’t tell you which STIHL product is best in every case. What I can do is compare them the way I compare repairs: by frequency of use, by downtime risk, and by the real cost to keep them running.
The Real Comparison: A Daily Machine vs. A Response Tool
A lawn mower and a chainsaw aren’t direct rivals. They compete for the same fleet budget, though. A mower is a workload machine. It gets used on a schedule, often several times a week. A chainsaw is more of a response tool, and the STIHL MS 170 chainsaw fits that role better than many bigger saws because it is easy to start, reasonably light, and capable enough for fence lines, storm cleanup, and smaller timber.
If your mower is down, you lose a day of production. If your saw is down during a storm job, you lose the window to clear the site. Both count, but they fail at different moments. That’s why I don’t think one is simply better than the other. I think you buy whichever protects the most billable hours for your crew.
What STIHL Lawn Mower Reviews Don’t Usually Mention
I read STIHL lawn mower reviews the same way I listen to customers at the counter. The good reviews talk about run time, deck cut quality, and whether it mulches well. The complaints usually involve a smaller issue, like a cable adjustment, a charging connection, or green debris packed under the deck. Most of those problems are not terminal.
In a service bay, a mower that runs three times a week deserves more preventive attention than a saw that runs three times a month. The question isn’t which one breaks less. It’s which one you can’t afford to wait on. A mower failure usually shows up on a Monday morning, when the schedule is full and replacement equipment is hard to find.
From the outside, a mower seems like a simple seasonal tool. The reality is that it carries most of the revenue for a lot of landscaping companies. That’s why lawn mower reviews written only about cutting performance miss half the story.
The March Morning That Changed How I Explain Chainsaw Value
A contractor called in around 7:30 in March 2024. His crew had a fence-line clearing job before a property inspection, and the saw was stalling under load. Normal turnaround for a carburetor service is two or three days in the slow season; that morning, same-day service was the only way he made the job.
He brought in a STIHL MS 170 with a hard fuel line that had pulled loose inside the tank and a diaphragm stiff enough to cause fuel starvation. This is a classic rush repair. To reach the line, long needle nose pliers are the difference between a thirty-minute tank service and an afternoon fighting with pieces of old hose. I use them to hook the line, guide a new one through the tank opening, and hold the fuel filter in place while the line seats. Without that tool, I would have had to drain the tank and partially remove the rear handle assembly. On a deadline, that’s too long.
The same week, our parts washer pump was out of service. That sounds like a minor issue until you’re cleaning carburetors by hand. It didn’t make the job impossible, but it made every job slower. When a service manager is triaging multiple rush repairs, slow is expensive. It reminded me that downtime is not just a machine problem. The tools behind the machine matter just as much.
That saw went back to the customer by mid-morning. The real lesson was not about the brand. It was that the cheapest option at that moment, like reusing an old fuel line, skipping the carburetor cleaning, or installing an untested replacement part, would have cost more than the repair saved.
Total Cost: Why I Don’t Recommend Based on the Lowest Price
My view on pricing is simple: value over price. The machine that costs less to buy is not always cheaper to run. I’ve watched contractors lose hours to a replacement part that looked the same but wasn’t the same. It takes the same amount of labor to install a bad part as it does to install a good one. Labor is not refundable.
People assume a cheap repair is a smart repair. Actually, the cheap repair only works when it fixes the root cause. To be fair, some aftermarket parts are fine. But if you run a business, a $30 savings on a carburetor is not worth losing half a day when the same job has to be redone. The same logic applies to shop equipment and even trailers.
For example, a client once asked me how to reset dump trailer hydraulic pump. The pump wasn’t dead; the thermal circuit breaker had tripped. The correct answer was in the trailer manual: let it cool down, find the reset button, and check the wiring before buying anything. Online searching can lead you to a $500 replacement pump before you ever see the $0 test.
When I compare the STIHL MS 170 chainsaw with bigger or cheaper options, that same thinking applies. A lower price can look great until the saw sits in the shop for three weeks waiting for parts while your crew burns a paid day. The value of any tool includes the support around it.
Bottom Line: Which One Should You Put on the Truck First?
If your company cuts turf for income, start with the mower. STIHL lawn mower reviews give you a good idea of runtime and cut quality, and dealer support matters more as the mower ages.
If your crew already has a dependable mower but gets called to clear brush, trim lots, or handle tree work, the STIHL MS 170 chainsaw is the better first saw. It’s not the biggest saw on the market, and it doesn’t need to be. For most people, it’s the one that gets used instead of left in the trailer.
After five seasons of watching the same failures come through the door, I’ve come to believe that the tool itself is only half the purchase. The other half is the help you get when the job is on the line. The cheapest quote is not always the bottom line. The best purchase is the one you can keep running under pressure.